There’s an old joke about a
police officer who was walking his beat one night when he came upon a man,
apparently drunk, crawling around on his hands and knees on the pavement under
a streetlamp.
“What are
you doing?” asked the officer.
“Looking for
my keys,” came the reply.
“Where’d
you lose them?” returned the constable.
“Over
there” answered the other, gesturing toward a shadowy area outside the halo of
the streetlamp.
“Then why
are you looking here?” demanded the bemused policeman.
“Well,”
said the man, looking up at the officer, “the light’s better here.”
I am
sometimes reminded of the unfortunate man under the streetlight when I am
engaged in discussion with atheists of my acquaintance. It’s not that
they are intoxicated, but that they insist on conducting the search for God
where He cannot possibly be found, using a method that is guaranteed not to
find Him.
Most
atheists I talk to are materialists, who insist that we can’t reasonably argue
for the existence of God unless we can detect his presence using the tools of
science. This is, of course, a very narrow and limited understanding of
“reason” (an one for which they have a hard time coming up with a reasonable
defense). They either can’t or won’t accept that the Creator of the
universe must logically be outside his creation (just as an artist
cannot be inside his own painting), while science can only detect things that
are part of the natural universe. If God is truly God, then finding Him
through scientific inquiry is as useless as looking for lost keys thirty feet
away from where you know you dropped them.
Unless, of course, you don’t want to find anything . . .
No comments:
Post a Comment